This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you accept our use of cookies and similar technologies,Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Oct 10 2013 - 10:13 AM
Is Strict Better than Nice in the Education World?

Is strict better than nice? This op-ed article Why Tough Teachers Get Good Grades explores the importance of a "tough" teacher -- one who doesn't sugarcoat your failures or sacrifice criticism in fear of hurting your feelings. The author argues that we should "revive old-fashioned" educational techniques, encouraging repetition and moderately stressful scenarios which will make students stronger and more confident in the end.

Lipman even goes on to suggest that our current "praise-centered" teaching methods are to blame for the education crisis. I think there's definitely something to be said for old school teaching styles. When I was in 4th grade, I had a teacher that made us listen to multiplication problems on this old-fashioned record player, and every week he would increase the speed of the recording and we had to jot down the answers as quickly as we could. After a while, I didn't even have to think about the problem--the answer just came automatically. I definitely credit my success in grade-school math to that teacher's "drill and memorization" method. But I also think we shouldn't revert back to old techniques just because they "worked back then."

The main points in Lipman's article are the following:

  • A little pain is good for you
  • Drill
  • Failure is an option
  • Strict is better than nice
  • Creativity can be learned
  • Grit trumps talent
  • Praise makes you weak
  • Stress makes you strong

I don't think I agree with all of these points (nice is TOTALLY better than strict and praise is needed sometimes!) but she does raise some good information to consider...

|By: Dana Haugh|3613 Reads